A blog about the intersection of medicine and business, produced by the members of the Medical Consumerism seminar at the University of Minnesota.
Monday, February 28, 2011
Matt Lamkin on brain-boosting drugs, in The Chronicle
Stimulants are second only to weed as the drug of choice for college students. Should they be banned? Matt Lamkin says no. Read it here.
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
This is the best thing I've ever read. Matt Lamkin should get some kind of medal, as well as a large monetary reward. Having made his contribution to humanity, he should be treated like a former US President -- large pension, an office, maybe a library with his name on it -- and be free to spend the rest of his life as he sees fit, without having to worry about supporting himself or his family. And to think that he accomplished all this without cognition-enhancing drugs. The mind reels. If he didn't seem like such a great guy (based solely on this amazing commentary), I'd be sick with jealousy.
1 comment:
This is the best thing I've ever read. Matt Lamkin should get some kind of medal, as well as a large monetary reward. Having made his contribution to humanity, he should be treated like a former US President -- large pension, an office, maybe a library with his name on it -- and be free to spend the rest of his life as he sees fit, without having to worry about supporting himself or his family. And to think that he accomplished all this without cognition-enhancing drugs. The mind reels. If he didn't seem like such a great guy (based solely on this amazing commentary), I'd be sick with jealousy.
Post a Comment