data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc0e1/cc0e17d72a331800ddb5a629eebd87775b95b762" alt=""
"We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live," a Merck employee wrote, referring to opinion leaders who criticized Vioxx. The Australian reports.
A blog about the intersection of medicine and business, produced by the members of the Medical Consumerism seminar at the University of Minnesota.
"The Government Accountability Office also said it was able to register with the Health and Human Services Department a fictitious institutional review board, a panel of doctors and scientists that must approve any medical drug or device to be used in federally funded testing on humans. The president of this fake review board was a dog named Trooper."
According to the Wall Street Journal: "The Journal of the American Medical Association, one of the world's most influential medical journals, says it is instituting a new policy for how it handles complaints about study authors who fail to disclose they have received payments from drug companies or others that pose a conflict: It will instruct anyone filing a complaint to remain silent about the allegation until the journal investigates the charge."
"The unusual order drew criticism from editors at other journals and fuels a debate about the role of medical journals in policing financial conflicts of researchers.""In the spring of 2000, Dr. S. Charles Schulz attended a national medical conference to present favorable research on a new psychiatric drug called Seroquel. Schulz, chief of psychiatry at the University of Minnesota, reported that the drug was 'significantly superior' to the old gold-standard treatment for schizophrenia. In a press release by the manufacturer, AstraZeneca, he touted the 'dramatic benefits' of Seroquel's class of drugs."
"But newly released documents show that AstraZeneca knew the research didn't support the claim -- and knew two months before Schulz went public with it."
In a longer, more detailed story, The Pioneer Press reports that "a U spokesman said that the dean of the medical school, Dr. Deborah Powell, is aware of the controversy over Schulz's research and has offered him her full support. ""As a result, newly unearthed documents show, Study 15 suffered the same fate as many industry-sponsored trials that yield data drugmakers don't like: It got buried. It took eight years before a taxpayer-funded study rediscovered what Study 15 had found -- and raised serious concerns about an entire new class of expensive drugs."
Read more in the Washington Post.
"Federal prosecutors say that a Massachusetts General Hospital psychiatrist became a 'star spokesman' in helping a pharmaceutical company promote its drugs for treating depressed children, even though the medications were not approved for pediatric use by the US Food and Drug Administration."
"In a complaint unsealed last week in US District Court in Boston, prosecutors allege that New York-based